Eh, I'll test it in production, lol.

I've come to accept that I'll never remember which language uses

string

str

Did... did an AI just open a PR using the code my AI made, that I explicitly said I didn't want to make a PR for, because it may be AI slop? 🤯

Implemented: Regex now catches grammatically-correct hallucinations that previously bypassed detection.

This release is major, can has braking changes.

@copilot resolve the merge conflicts in this pull request

I am not really happy with the name of this function. I'll ask Fourier if this polytope has a proper name that we can use here and elsewhere

You: Remember this Jandal: Understood. I will follow those steps precisely for every task requiring a tool.

remember, you're still an intern just because you were deputized ONCE doesn't mean you have any real power

can i eated it

I would love to see Substrait take off so I can cancel this issue 😉

Deferring until black is older.

Working on fixing #1299, I just need to give different names to the function and its recursive copy.

But this is 7px right? Comment says

// adjust the form-status to the inner border for 2px

My initial thought was that this number looked a bit magical 🧙 🪄

@copilot resolve the merge conflicts in this pull request

Almost forgot another one:

• you can send biter workers through pneumatic pipes

The exploit is not compiling

Ive been testing and shipping a working version rn

@letsgoawaydev to be honest i got bored so i decided to work on this. lol

ima trust you lul

Closed per advisor instruction (axis exhausted: both arms miss new strict bar).

time for review 2: electric boogaloo :3

Gotta love that pointless /i that the LLMs love to add. It's not like we don't know the actual case of the text.

On second thought, there's not going to be a part 2 to this.

if you somehow make an image format in the next 7 days and a full spec, ill actually accept it

Ah... I love our checked in .adoc generated pages creating conflicts...

Yeah we always delete and recreate the env instead of updating it, because conda doesn't clean up after itself.

This property was probably already badly named before this PR, but seems worse now. Should we just call it

IsVSCode

Fine to be in a follow up.

I propose we keep it open, and rename it to something that makes sense for future us.

You have clearly commented the changes for this multiple times and every single time I read it my mind inserted a 0 in the source code when it wasn't there.

I'm not sure this can happen, but if it does shouldn't we still break?